Prediction of Guillaume Dalmasso [729th] vs Benjamin Vitter [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W L W
Form
L W W L L L L W L LHead To Head: Dalmasso 1 - 0 Vitter
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dalmasso winning 2 and Vitter winning 0. The last match between Dalmasso and Vitter was at the M15 Rognac, 23-07-2024, First, Hard with Guillaume Dalmasso getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guillaume Dalmasso | 1 |
| Benjamin Vitter | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Benjamin Vitter
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:15:0 | Average Match Time | 1:15:0 |
| 57% (27/47) | 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) |
| 89% (24/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 55% (11/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (27/54) | Return Points Win % | 26% (12/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Guillaume Dalmasso vs Benjamin Vitter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dalmasso 1 - 0 Vitter
Editorial Prediction:
Guillaume Dalmasso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Abdoulaziz Bationo
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
80)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
13
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Jean-Paul Kadangah Kili
46%
(
17 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Michalis Sakellaridis
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petros Tsitsipas
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien Dando
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
37
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
William Jucha
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Vitter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Reveniau
Player
Benjamin Vitter
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Benjamin Vitter
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Marwan Haida-Lamrani
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Benjamin Vitter
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Binet
Player
Benjamin Vitter
45%
(
39 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Benjamin Vitter
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Sven Corbinais
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Vitter
Player
Noah Boutleux
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Benjamin Vitter
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (50/39) | Win/Loss | 50% (15/15) |
| 55% (111/90) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (31/37) |
| 52% (1018/944) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (328/351) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 280 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 300 | Total Double Faults | 91 |
| 1:19:32 | Average Match Time | 1:29:56 |
| 305.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.8 |
| 60% (2730/4551) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1063/1725) |
| 71% (1946/2730) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (676/1063) |
| 48% (877/1821) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (311/662) |
| 43% (182/419) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (76/191) |
| 39% (1838/4697) | Return Points Win % | 41% (722/1764) |
| 56% (49/87) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 52% (11/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 88% (7/8) |
| 93% (44/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 7% (44/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 20% (45/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (18/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
